SearchNavigation |
pwrdfblogDrama and DevelopmentMany of you may not know, but when I was a teen (back in the dark ages) I used to do a lot of improv at Theatresports in Toronto. In my 20s and early 30s, I worked at St. John's York Mills, and had the privilege of working tangentially with the drama program there-- again, with plenty of improv in my time with the youth I was working with. So I wasn't all that worried last week when, after a lovely Christmas lunch here at the office, we moved into our staff meeting and discovered that we would be playing theatre games. Before you ask, no-- this is *not* what a typical staff meeting looks like. Adele Finney, our Executive Director, led us through an unorthodox visioning exercise involving theatre games. The culmination of the time was playing the game "machines". If you already know this game, skip the next paragraph. But if you're not an improv junkie, you might want to learn how the game works: read on. Machines begins with one person moving to the centre of the stage and beginning and repeating a simple action and noise. It could be something as simple as miming pressing a car horn and saying "beep beep". They continue to do that motion and sound until the game ends. A second person then joins in and adds their own motion and sound- possibly directly interacting with the first person, perhaps just nearby. Then another person joins. And another, until the machine is complete. The goal of the game is for a machine to organically be created with some purpose. In some versions of the game, a final actor comes on the stage and describes how the machine works. In other versions, the machine is named either before it starts or as part of the description of its function. We didn't have anyone explaining the machines, but Adele gave us the kind of machines we were to make. They started off fairly easy: "Make a food machine", but moved into more cerebral and philosophical territory. Our culminating machine was "Make a machine that shows what PWRDF will be like in 3 years." The machine I wanted to talk briefly about (after all this introduction) was one called a "responding to HIV and AIDS machine." The machine began fairly conventionally with a couple of people moving onto the stage and moving around, miming giving out food and medicine. I stood on the sidelines, watching. Then Zaida, one of our development staff, stepped into the middle and began to flap her hand against her chest and breathe in a raspy, wheezy voice. She was clearly not part of the machine, but was someone suffering from AIDS. Her breathing was incredibly poignant, and her simple action and sound moved us all. I couldn't stand on the sidelines anymore. I stepped in and became a "comforting" part of the machine: patting her shoulder and breaking a rule of the game by using actual words ("We're here") as part of my response. The people who were already in the machine moved over to Zaida and began giving the food and medicine to her (another breaking of a rule- you're not supposed to change your action at all during machines). Others joined in, all focused on easing her suffering. It was an incredible moment- not one that could be scripted. Not one that could even happen within the rules of the game. But one that touched us all. It reminded us that our work is not the work of machines, but is work with people. People who are in difficult circumstances. People who are suffering. People who crave human contact, and to live with dignity, love, and hope- the same things we all want. It also reminded us that sometimes we have to break the "rules" in order to do what we do in the best manner possible. Sometimes it's not enough to sit back and wait for things to happen: sometimes you have to go out and *make* them happen. This game might not have given us our vision for PWRDF in 2015, but it reinforced for us all why we were there. Hmm. Maybe it *did* give us a vision, after all! A Walk in Rivier FroidAs soon as I heard it, I knew I’d arrived. It wasn’t the sound I thought it would be. In fact, I didn’t even But, this afternoon, I heard a domino get slammed down on a playing Last year when I was in the Dominican Republic with my family, I Trips like this one involve a lot of being driven from project to Rarely do we get to climb down from the vehicles and walk through a village. But it happened today. We had to walk in about 15 minutes up some very steep hills in the Curious, I glanced down to see dozens of children playing in the After we crossed the river, we walked through a village comprised of Because we were traveling with Father Cole, the local priest, there And for me, walking through the village was a fantastic experience. I The Kingdom on EarthToday, Naba and I visited the parish of St. Matthieu with Father But I don’t really want to get into the technical specs of what we’ve Today, I want to get all theological and share something Father Cole One thing that is important to note before I tell you what Father Father Cole thanked us for our partnership with CEDDISEC, and said I think he summed up in two sentences the mission of PWRDF here in That work is taking place in the work of a Canadian engineer who has We Are Family
Last fall, I had the pleasure to visit the ACT offices in Geneva when But it is since I have come to Haiti that I have really come to As members of the family, we’ve been able to visit the offices of There are 10 ACT members who are “operational” here in Haiti. That The 10 members who are operational here meet every two weeks to talk The collaboration between the different agencies has been great to On Wednesday night, we went out to dinner with staff from LWF and I’ve been a supporter of PWRDF’s involvement in ACT for quite a while The Comedian15 hours after getting ready to leave this morning, I’m back in Naba and I traveled with Jaana from Fin Church Aid (FCA) out into the I will be writing more formally about the school canteen program, as Delmut Evans was introduced to us as a comedian who wanted to say He had the other 477 students at l’Ecole Nationale Trouin laughing In addition to being a comedy act looking for a network, he also had Needless to say, I taught him to say “I am awesome!” I showed him a Meeting him was such a pleasure, and it was great to visit a project More tomorrow when I’ve had some sleep myself. Building Capacity and Shelters
While in Leogane, we visited the LWF field office, where- among other The main reason we were there, though, was to visit some transitional shelters and see how they’re made. What, you may ask, is a transitional shelter? Excellent question! Immediately after a disaster, those who lost their homes generally Enter the transitional house. We saw two types: ones made of wood The cool thing about this project is that not only are almost 500 These teams of 10 (the one person trained by LWF and their 9 $10 a day may not sound like much, but in a country where the majority of people earn less than $1 a day, it’s a huge deal! Haiti- First ImpressionsNaba and I landed in Port-au-Prince a couple of hours ago, and are I thought I’d take this opportunity to give you my first impressions My first impression was one I mostly expected when flying over Haiti- As we flew in over the hills and ocean, there was certainly a lot of The airport was interesting. There were 4 lines at immigration, The less said about this experience the better, but suffice it to say We eventually reclaimed our luggage, with almost all the things still The drive through Port-au-Prince was interesting to me. As we left Haiti is the fifth country I’ve visited for PWRDF (well, technically For one, there are generally compounds- houses with walls and gates When I was in Burundi a couple of years ago, a significant portion of The other interesting thing I’ve seen in each country I’ve visited is Here in Haiti, they are modified pickup trucks with colourful tops on The other kind of vehicle we saw a lot of was dump trucks. Even I can’t wait to start meeting our partners and learning about the Off at LastI'm not sure if I'm in denial or tired or what, but today it's feeling kind of unreal that I leave for Haiti in 12 hours...
I'm sure once I've landed in Port-au-Prince tomorrow afternoon, it will hit home. As I get to see for myself what has happened (or not happened) in the almost 2 years since the earthquake. As I meet our partners who have been working for those 22 months to bring relief, hope, and a sense of the future to those affected by the earthquake. I'm really looking forward to seeing the school feeding program we are involved in, learning about efforts to start urban agriculture in Port-au-Prince, even to visit an Internally Displaces People (IDP)'s camp within the city. Yes, almost 2 years later, there are still many thousands of people living in tents in these camps. Reconstruction is S L O W! I think it's great that we will be meeting up with other Canadians from the Canadian Foodgrains Bank while we are there- it feels kind of odd to travel to Haiti to meet up with friends from Winnipeg, but there you go. Such is life in this industry! I'm also looking forward to meeting with Canadian government representatives while we're there- I really valued the time I had last year with the Canadian International Development Agency's staff in Colombo, and I'm sure it will be just as valuable in Port-au-Prince! I will be blogging about my experiences- hopefully with photos too, depending on the wi-fi capacity where I'm staying. With any luck, the blogs will be appearing over at the (holding my breath until it's launched) brand-new pwrdf.org website with a cross-post back here to LJ. But, even if the website hits some snag today and isn't launched, I'll be blogging here as often as I can from the field. So, wish me luck, and hopefully this will all feel real when it is real- tomorrow! A Migrant MomentPWRDF's Executive Director, Adele Finney, is in Hong Kong on the second leg of her Asian trip. Here is her blog for November 15.
Late yesterday afternoon when we finished our meeting for the day I went upstairs to my room and fell asleep. I woke up with a start about an hour later and had no idea where I was or the time. I knew if I remained calm I’d get my bearings within seconds. Hong Kong. Mariner’s Club. Anglican Alliance. Dinner time. We’re three days into the Anglican Alliance Asian regional meeting, the second part of my Asian trip. It’s always such an upside-down-inside-out experience to work at a task together with people from several different countries. Countries represented here are China, Philippines, Burma, Pakistan, India, Korea, Sri Lanka, United States, Canada, Australia, UK and Uruguay. It’s been very intense as we respond to papers about relief, migrants and refugees, advocacy on climate change and hear from people about their country context, teasing out what Asians think the Alliance should work on over the next three years. What makes it both wonderful and intense is that all the stories PWRDF hears and passes on to you have faces and bodies writ large with passion, courage, pain, sometimes discouragement or cynicism, but mostly joy in being together. Yesterday we visited St. John’s Cathedral where we heard about three programs. Helpers for Domestic Helpers is part of the community outreach program of St. John’s Cathedral. Lawyers and legal assistants provide free legal advice, assistance and guidance to some of the 291,764 foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong (2011), 89% of them Filipino, 10% Indonesian and 1% Other. I’m becoming aware on this trip of how many lawyers provide essential pro bono services to vulnerable and suffering people. For the good, without cost. The other two organizations are supported by PWRDF. The St. John’s HIV Education Center was the first in Hong Kong to address the HIV and AIDS epidemic. The government took notice and began support services, so the cathedral program is now turning its attention to the wider region. The Mission for Migrant Workers provides assistance and counselling to migrant workers, 99% of whom are women who came to Hong Kong out of economic necessity to support their families and who labour primarily as domestic workers (4000+ people leave the Philippines each day to seek employment overseas). This is the vision of both the domestic workers and the Mission for Migrant Workers: We dream of a society where families are not torn apart by the need to survive. We dream of, and will actively work for, a homeland where all can live decently and with dignity. My waking up not knowing where I was or the time, was a passing disorientation. It’s nothing like the confusing dispossession of people who leave families and countries in hope of a better life for themselves, but mostly for their children. Voices of PartnershipPWRDF's Executive Director, Adele Finney, is currently visiting PWRDF partners in Asia. Here is her third blog from her trip:
“As those who oppress people around the world have all the time to come together, the churches can be the spaces where those who suffer can come together,” said Father Rex, NCCP (National Council of Churches of the Philippines) General Secretary. Hmmm, I thought. What would that look like in Canada? Maybe the weekly Saturday lunch the church hosts for those who may not have enough money to buy food for a whole month or need the companionship of a friendly table. “We love company,” said Bishop Nathanael Lazaro, NCCP Chairperson. What better people with whom to talk about partnership! The NCCP has 20 international partners, ten representatives of whom are here at the table for the Bilateral Partners’ Conference and to mark the beginning of NCCP’s 50th anniversary. You may be asking, “What is a bilateral partner, and who cares?” Good question. It’s a World Council of Churches’ term for the relationship between national councils of churches and external churches and agencies. The funding part of that relationship has always been a challenge because it skews who holds the power. The Filipino and bilateral partners at this meeting have tried to redefine their relationship and spent Friday afternoon finding words for how they want live out their partnership from here on. None of the action items are funding requests, but rather common causes and commitments to base all our work together in the Filipino people’s struggles and joys. That makes church partnership a different kind of animal than we’re used to in Canada. What does partnership mean in a country declared by the United Nations as the third most vulnerable country to the effects of climate change? In a country where 4000+ people leave the country daily to work overseas because there are not enough jobs to provide sustainable living? In a country where over 1200 human rights activists have been the victims of extra-judicial killings, and the perpetrators ride away on motorcycles with impunity? The Filipinos at this meeting say partnership means a lot. It means they are not alone, that someone hears and works to make spaces for their voices and concerns to be heard in the wider world. At the closing dinner and celebration, partnership was a lot of fun. There was a wonderful children’s anklung (Asian bamboo instrument) ensemble. The Teatro Ekyumenikal kept before us hope in the midst of injustice and suffering. There were great songs, great singers, great food...and an item called “The Ecumenical Partners Creative Offering” that took two attempts to get us on our feet—our partners were not letting us walk away from the celebration without contributing to it in kind. We finally asked the children’s anklung ensemble to replay a song, and we did something like a conga line and then invited new partners to join us. We weren’t great, but our hearts were fully on the dance floor. A Million Reasons to be OnlinePWRDF hit a milestone this week. In September, 2005 we joined CanadaHelps, a website which allows non-profits to receive donations online. Between our launch 6 years ago and this week, PWRDF has raised over $1million online: $1,034,900 to be precise.
Of that total, $428,386 came in during 2010. So, why am I writing about this? First of all, because it's good news and it's awesome to be able to share it! Also, I want to be able to thank all those who have been part of that million dollar effort. But I also want to talk a bit about online fundraising. Now, those of you who know me know that fundraising is *not* my forte. I have a hard time asking someone to pitch in for gas when I drive them somewhere, let alone asking them to give money to a cause. The best that I can do is to tell stories of what we do and why our work is so great (something I LOVE doing), and hope it leads people to support us. As a professional fundraiser, I'd be a flop. But online fundraising is something I'm learning a lot more about in the last little while. And the more I learn about it, the more clear it becomes to me how important it is, and how I need to get better at it. So I'm trying! As PWRDF launches its new website (soon soon soon I hope!) I'm aware that we need to expand our online donations portal. We will be looking to make online donating much easier and more functional in the coming months. I also wanted to touch briefly on the totals coming in online last year. The statistics around online donation show that disaster relief brings in significant amounts of online donations, and 2010 bore that out for PWRDF. The Haiti earthquake and Pakistan flooding accounts for the lion's share of the $428,000 we raised online last year. I know that the Japan tsunami and Horn of Africa drought will have accounted for significant portions of this year's online donations, too! So, again, thanks to all who have helped us reach the million dollar milestone online! I'll be curious to see how long it takes to raise our second million this way! Silence my SoulHere is the second guest blog by Adele Finney, PWRDF's Executive Director, from her travels to Asia.
Quezon City, Philippines Bilateral Partners Conference November 10, 2011 My computer says it’s 12.06 a.m. It obviously didn’t register the cross-Pacific flight. My watch says it’s 1.03 p.m. Manila time. I’m at the table of the National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP). We’re on an hour-and-a-half lunch and siesta break, with people taking turns doing “horizontal meditation” in one of the three rooms upstairs reserved for naps. The people who probably need the naps most are still sitting at the meeting table with iPads, telephones and laptops, keeping up with e-mail and work back in Korea, Canada, Australia, New York and Grand Rapids, Michigan. There are even pens and notebooks. This Bilateral Partners Conference (more on “bilateral partners” next time) opened with a dramatic dance and worship service. The Philippines has long been a leader in the expressive arts for the common good. Nearly 30 years ago I participated in theatre workshops the Philippines Educational Theatre Association conducted throughout southeast Asia introducing effective dramatic tools for citizen reflection and participation in social issues. The NCCP has started Teatro Ekyumenikal that weekly brings together 28 youth from its member denominations to study scripture, improvise, reflect on and create dramatic pieces for worship services. About seven of the youth danced the beauty and struggle of the Philippines towards a just and merciful society. Then we sang a song I had not heard before:Silence my soul these trees are prayers; I asked the tree, tell me about God. Then, it blossomed. The arts—dance, song, storytelling, painting—are the best ways I know to start moving the molecules around (more on the molecules here). In this coming year, the 28 youth in Teatro Ekyumenikal will share what they have learned in their home congregations and denominations, and we pray they will blossom as they blossomed today. When Am I?The following is the first guest-blog by Adele Finney, PWRDF's Executive Director. She is currently travelling to Asia to meet with PWRDF partners there and also with the Anglican Alliance, and will be blogging as much as she can while she is away.
On the way to partner visits in the Philippines and an Anglican Alliance meeting in Hong Kong November ?, 2011 I’m not actually sure what day it is as I fly from Vancouver to Hong Kong. I know I left Ottawa Monday at 5.45 p.m., left Vancouver Tuesday at 2.10 a.m. and will arrive in Hong Kong on Wednesday morning. The screen on the back of the seat in front of me says it is 5.35 a.m., Hong Kong time. When I land I will adjust my watch and live in the reality of time in the Hong Kong airport until I leave for Manila. PWRDF development staff do this kind of travel as a matter of course; it’s part of their jobs. Farida Akhter of Bangladesh just made this kind of journey back and forth to Toronto last week for the PWRDF Board of Directors meeting, her last meeting after six years on the board. Airplane travel is the closest we’ve gotten to the “Beam me up, Scotty” transporter. My mother-in-law who grew up as a missionary kid in India in the 1910s and 20s travelled by boat from Madras (now Chennai) to Boston. When she arrived and stepped into her first automobile ride, she described herself as so overwhelmed that she "nearly lost her composure". Our family smiled and thought it was a sweet, old-fashioned expression. I tend to call it being “undone” in a transporter kind of way. Over the past few years I’ve taken to seeing myself as mostly space, atoms whizzing around in a living, energetic human form. I try to see “undoings” as opportunities for opening myself to God’s Spirit moving through me and rearranging my spiritual, cultural and probably physical, molecules. It requires trust rather than fear, hope rather than dread. That’s the way I choose to be on this trip to visit PWRDF’s Filipino partners and meet with the Anglican Alliance in Hong Kong. Meetings Meetings MeetingsSo I'm sitting in the back corner of a meeting room at the Toronto Airport Hotel this afternoon at joint meetings of the PWRDF Board of Directors, Youth Council, and Diocesan Representatives. Once every two years all these different groups get together to meet each other and PWRDF staff, to learn from each other, and to continue to build the organization.
This is my second one of these Leadership Forums (Fora?) and I must say I find it incredibly valuable to be at them. Today I got to present the designs for the new PWRDF and justgeneration.ca websites, which went really well. But what I really like is the chance to meet people I get to see rarely or have never met. Today I met Tim Grew, who is a diocesan representative in Ontario and who runs a great Facebook group for his diocese. We've never met face-to-face- just facebook-to-facebook. But now we know each other. And because we know each other, we are better able to help each other to share the work we are doing for the organization. While I support the value of social media and spend tons of time on it, I also understand the real need for regular, in person interaction to build stronger relationships and to share in a way that online doesn't allow. The other great thing today is that I'm currently listening to Jim Cornelius, the Executive Director of the Canadian Foodgrains Bank and Sally Keeble, the Director of the Anglican Alliance, talk about their work. It's great to see these two people getting to know each other and to talk about how CFGB and the Alliance can support each other in our work. Being in the same space as each other is allowing this conversation to happen in a way that would never happen otherwise. So, I guess today's post is mostly a social media commentary on the need for offline communications and relationships. I hope the next Forum in 2013 is just as valuable for learning, networking, and relationship building! Aid Effectiveness vs. Development EffectivenessI just got back from a webinar (in a different room on the whole other side of the building!) about the difference between aid effectiveness and development effectiveness. I've got to admit, a lot of the technical aspects and acronyms they were using (WP-Eff anyone) were a little out of my experience.
But then the presenter, from the Canadian Council for International Cooperation, put up a slide highlighting the differences between aid effectiveness and development effectiveness. And I got it. A lot of it is about the difference between charity (aid) and justice (development). He offered about a dozen comparitors, but I want to share 3 of them here, because I found them particularly striking. Aid effectiveness is about trickle down, development effectiveness is about equitable distribution. Aid effectiveness is about the symptoms of poverty, development effectiveness is about the causes of poverty. Aid effectiveness is about jobs, development effectiveness is about decent work. As I type these in, I realize they're all about economics, but they can be applied in other ways as well (about human needs vs human rights for example). But these four that I pulled out really struck me as being about why I work at PWRDF. Because I really believe that we need to change how we approach things in the world- a paradigm shift rather than a shuffling of deck chairs. The idea of equitable distribution rather than a trickle down from the rich to the poor strikes at the heart of this. It's what the 99% movement is about. It's what "deep justice" is about. The difference between symptoms and causes is an old one. The old expression "if you give a person a fish, you feed them for a day, if you teach them to fish, you feed them for a lifetime" began to get at this question. That expression has significant problems, but it's one many people are familiar with. So it makes a good starting point for that idea. But the one that struck me most today was the difference between jobs and decent work. I listen to the business reports on the radio (well, sometimes- I don't listen to the radio much any more) and hear the economic statements about how many jobs were created or lost each month. Rarely do they talk about how many of the jobs are part-time or minimum wage, just how many net jobs were gained. Now I've worked my share of Mc-Jobs in my day, and- while they did come with a paycheck- I am much happier with what I am doing here. And I've got the benefit of a developed nation's legal and social structure keeping my jobs fairly safe. I must say, having "decent work" strikes me as being much more affirming, dignified, and better economically than having a "job." I am not, by the way, saying that aid isn't important. It is. But if development issues are never addressed- if the causes are never examined- aid will be a perpetual and growing need. By working significantly to address the causes of poverty through development, we as a species can really cut back on the need for aid in the first place! So, that's what stuck out for me in terms of aid effectiveness and development effectiveness. I'll wrap up by sharing a video that we watched the first few minutes of which talks about development effectiveness. The first 2:47 is what we watched in the presentation, and it's worth a look! The Best $2There are days in this job where things go great, where you know you're making a difference and that the world is slightly better because of the awesome things you get to be a part of. And there are days that are awful, when you hear about yet another injustice, murder, disaster, or problem. And then there are days that just touch you.
Yesterday was one of these. The drought and famine in East Africa was a major news story this summer, and was an emergency that PWRDF promoted a lot. Anglicans responded with over $750,000 dollars in donations to the relief efforts through PWRDF, money that is being put to good use in Somalia, Ethiopia, and Kenya. As we have been processing the donations, Ricky- a member of our admin team- came across one of our online donations. The donation was for $2. There was a note attached to it, which read: In keeping with the Biblical account of the woman who gave two mites, I am giving the only $2 I have right now, in the hopes that it will relieve someone, somewhere, in the horn of Africa. (For those of you not familiar with the story of the widow's mite, here it is from Luke's gospel: He looked up and saw rich people putting their gifts into the treasury;he also saw a poor widow put in two small copper coins. He said, ‘Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all of them; for all of them have contributed out of their abundance, but she out of her poverty has put in all she had to live on.’ Luke 21:1-4) Reading the note that this person attached to his donation made my day. Not just that he was remembering the importance of giving small things, but that he wanted to make sure his last $2 went to help someone who was worse off than himself. This donor is my inspiration for today. Thanks to you, sir, for sharing of yourself to make the world better for everyone! Got your GoatLast week I was at a gathering of fellow communications professionals from church-based relief and development agencies (for a full list of acronyms, visit the CFGB website!) During our conversations, the topic of buying goats came up. Again.
Goats are a short-form for talking about the gift guides that are omnipresent this time of year. Started by World Vision about 20 years ago, they have become wildly popular as a means for people to give a meaningful "gift" to those who have everything. You look through the catalogue, choose a development gift to buy, and the organization sends a card to the person you are buying it for. Great idea, right? Not necessarily. PWRDF and many other development agencies are not big fans of the "buy a goat" idea because we believe that development should be instigated by the people living in the situation, rather than the person giving the money. Or, to put it another way, what if the person to whom the goat would be given doesn't want or need a goat? When I was in Burundi a couple of years ago, I had a conversation with Edmond, one of our partners there. He told me a story about this situation, where a foreign agency came in and did what they thought was right for the people of this village. Here's what he told me: There is a Twa (the Twa, or pygmies, make up about 1% of the Burundian population) village which was very run down. The houses were a mess- dirty, broken down. The people sat around with nothing to do. So a foreign non-governmental organization (NGO) came in and gave everyone pigs. The pigs were to provide occupation, income, and food for the village. About a year later, the NGO came back and found the people of the village sitting around among dirty, broken down houses with nothing to do. There were no pigs in sight. The NGO staffer asked, "What happened here? We set you up last year- spending $100,000 on this village- with all the things you needed to be pig farmers! We come back now, and nothing has changed! What have you all done?" The villagers told them, "We are not farmers. We are potters. We know nothing about caring for pigs, and they died. Now, if you had given us potter's wheels and kilns, we would have been much better off!" This illustrated exactly one of the problems with giving a goat. The other problem is less tangible but probably even more important. It has to do with philosophy of development. At PWRDF (and at the other agencies who were represented in our discussion: PWS+D, CCODP, ADRA, CFGB, WRC, and CBM- I warned you about the acronyms!) we believe that all the people we partner with are the people who are best equipped to know what the solutions are to the problems they are facing. They are the ones living in the situation. They are the ones who know the local context. They know what needs to be done to remedy the issues. My coming in and telling them "I want to give you a goat" is condescending, patronizing, and all kinds of other things that remove the dignity and power that every person has. Now, the more aware among you might point out that PWRDF has a gift guide (you can find it here). So, you might say, aren't you doing the same thing that you're complaining about above? My answer is this: "Well, not really." You see, I wrote our gift guide very carefully. We understand the power of a concrete symbol like a goat. Goats are, to use the marketing lingo, sexy. People understand giving a goat where they don't understand working to promote gender equity among communities. It's easy to get people to donate a goat. In fact, they *want* to donate a goat. So I have written items in our gift guide that are concrete and easy to understand: feed a child in Haiti, train a midwife in Mexico, give micro-credit loans in Bangladesh. But each of the items I have written is contained within a sector of PWRDF's work: food security, health care, etc. and the donations will go to that sector (each page of the gift catalogue with PWRDF's gifts on it makes that clear.) Rather than buying a specific goat for a specific person, the donation will go to PWRDF's food security program. Yes, we will be feeding 3200 students in Haiti this year. We are not making things up just for the guide. But the donations will go to that area of work, even if not to that specific piece of work. And we will be funding fully all the programs talked about in the guide. Most of the other guides out there also get a goat through to whoever buys a goat. And that goat often goes somewhere where it will be useful. Just, not all the time. What do you think about alternative gift guides like this? Do you use them? How would you approach this issue, if you were in PWRDF's shoes? Climate Change MarketplaceI've just come back to my desk after a fascinating presentation by Maria Theresa Nera-Lauron of the People's Movement on Climate Change. Tetet (only her mother calls her Maria Theresa- and only when she is in trouble!) came to Canada from the Philippines to present in Ottawa and Montreal and now in Toronto on issues relating to climate change and land grabbing. While I won't go into details about everything she talked about (it would fill screens and screens, and I don't want too may tl;dr reactions) I did want to reflect a bit about one topic- REDD+.
REDD+, or Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries, is one of the current "solutions" to the climate problem. Looking at the title, it sounds like a great idea. Reduce emissions. Stop deforestation and degradation. Help people in developing countries. It's a win-win-win, right? If only! Unfortunately, the policy document for REDD+ contains- in addition to great rhetoric about mitigating climate change and reducing poverty in the developing world- some fine print. "The problem is always in the fine print," Tetet said repeatedly in her presentation. The fine print in REDD+ allows corporations to do some creative accounting and shift some credits around, allowing them to actually contribute more to deforestation than they could before. In addition, the definition of "forest" has changed in this document. When I say "forest", what do you think of? I'll bet your image involves large trees, possibly some undergrowth. Maybe some animals- deer perhaps, or foxes, or bears. Does it involve sugarcane plantations? No? Well, according to the documentation of REDD+, plantations will count as "forests", allowing companies to cut down old growth forests and plant sugarcane, pineapples, or other crops. Does that sound like preventing deforestation to you? I didn't think so! As Tetet was talking about the dangers of allowing corporations to make the battle against climate change an opportunity for further profit, I thought about Annie Leonard's "The Story of Cap-and-Trade", one of her Story of Stuff series of videos. Rather than going into the details she provided, I will finish today's entry by sharing Annie's thoughts on the corporatization of the battle against climate change. Tetet and Annie come from very different backgrounds, but they both see the problem in the current situation. Hopefully more of us will see it, too, and will stand up for real change which will help humanity to adapt our behaviours rather than simply mitigating the effects of climate change! |